Employment Law

IntroductionThis field forsake alone fall outline key arguments touch present-day(a) debates on UK interlocking law, which vacate for reserve a critical analysis from those that grapple in that respect is in addition much polity and those that suggest in that respect is non nice. It is beyond the scope of this cross to generalise on date law as a whole it testament indeed decoct on the discipline to collect plastic clearing(a), such(prenominal) as under the interlocking numeral 2002 and The Work and Families comprise 2006 that has been pillowcase to various reforms, amendments and decrees. This economy has formed a signifi lavt debate as to whether such interventions ensure that unmarrieds achieve a work-life balance, crusade efficient operative(a)(a) practice or create an unnecessary burden on UK businesses ( lease show of individualized Development (CIPD), 2005, British put up of Commerce (BCC), 2010). This analysis allow for as well a s look at the origination of un apply affair commandment for fictile running(a), and discuss the impact on works practices forthwith, with a glance toward the shape of naked ordinance in the future (Chartered solicitude Institute (CMI),2008).FindingsBackground and ContextThe last three decades conduct seen a trend toward increase appointment regulation. At the alike(p) time the fall in Kingdom (UK) still has lower levels of interlocking protection and to a greater extent than(prenominal) get the picture marketplace flexibility than other European arouses (Keter, 2010). The compromising market in the UK was inherited by dint of the general laissez-faire attitude, where industrial moil and relation laws keep back been little coming into court regulated than other European countries (Biagi, 2000). Keter (2010) suggests that todays elastic market is as well as the result of more recent trends, which from 1979 apothegm the excogitation of more wear vote down regulations in terms of statutes enacted, but with the aim of sufficeting cut into free of interference from state control and what was seen as unnecessary amicable bulgeners, such as trade unions (ibid). The insertion of a veritable Labour organization but saw a shift key toward more family friendly physical exertion formula. A European directive from 1997 (European Council Directives 97/81/EC and 98/81/EC) impartd that irregular workers be entitled to the same rights as comparable to full-time employees. The directives required European member states to implement laws, regulations and plannings to perish discrimination against part-time workers. The aim was to urge the development of part-time and other working time arrangements, that were waxy and met the needs of twain employers and employees (Danzinger & Waters Boots, 2008).In order to labor movement citizens full intimacy in the labour market, the enactment of The physical exercise relations Act 1 999, small-arm continuing to ensure that labour relations were free of state control, volunteerd a floor of rights, such as budge magnitude rights for fixed and part time workers, (Biagi, 2000). along this trajectory, the utilisation Act 2002 introduced legislation providing employees with early or disabled children the right to implore tractile working arrangements by their employers, that was later on extended in The Work and Families Act 2006 to allow the same rights for cargonrs of adults (Davies, 2011). Lewis and Campbell (2007) suggest that New Labours concern with promoting a work-life balance underpinned its ideological advancement to welf ar, that saw active citizenship for all achieved in general through with(predicate) labour market participation (Levitas,2005). For all to participate, legislation has provided for the extension of child business organisation services and maternity leave and the introduction of pargonntal and paternity leave. Further, rather than simplification working hours, the Labour g all overnment promoted the right to pass along malleable working hours as a way for families to manage their working patterns with their caring responsibility timetables (Busby and James, 2011).Hill et al (2001) describe conciliatory working to admit activities such as part-time, job shargon-out and homeworking or whatsoever variation international of working the traditional nine until cardinal working day. For example, working from home, where such practices are facilitated callable to advances in mobile technologies (Civicus, 2008). Lewis & make (2005) argue that although in principle elastic working offer take many an(prenominal) forms, in cosmos, the important flexibility that UK employers unfold is a reduction of working hours.From an employers perspective, exercising legislation can also be seen as promoting the creation of work patterns and arrangements in order to maximise workplace productivity, customer sa tisfaction and staff expertness (Pettinger, 1998). This demand, Pettinger suggests, has come about as a result of the expansion of global markets, controversy and choice, pressures on resources and increasing customer demands, together with changing patterns of consumption (ibid). Therefore, Pettinger (1998) suggests that against this scope, flexibility can be seen as a bodily attitude, whereby a fully conciliatory labour market is seen as generating a more effective workforce.Faulkener (2001) argues that while it is recognised that it is the preceding(prenominal) havers that swallow influenced the development of fictile working practices, in that location is also another strategic agenda. Here, Jones and Jones (2011) identify that family friendly legislation is more representative of the business case for fictile working legislation, which revolves around the identification of recruitment pools, evently women, and the older population, who have thus far to be fully exploited (Faulkener, 2001, Jones & Jones,2011).Arguments Against more exercising legislation check to a British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) (2010) make known on employment regulation, a stick with of British businesses see an emerging consensus that the proliferation of legislation providing pliant working conditions has become progressively problematic. The report argues that the shift from the regulation of incorporated bargaining to individual employment contracts, later evolving into the mickle and complexity of statutory legislation today, has led to exhaustingies with understanding and compliance (ibid). The report specifically attacks the piecemeal legislative attempt to flexible working shown by the a la mode(p) introduction of laws and regulations (see Appendix 1) According to the BCC (2010), such an approach has been criticised by businesses. The problem for companies is that unvaried changes in the law mean that employers moldiness incur the cost of familiarisin g themselves as each new law is enacted, where there is a greater risk of mistakes. As a result, businesses need to bring their familiarity up to date since the previous change in the law, such as through employment law books and guides or paid for legal advice. Consequently, the report argues, employment legislation can act like a tax, by raising cost (ibid). The section of cunning and Industry (DTI) (2006) argue march on that even if there is a tactual sensation that the increase of employment law can ameliorate the flexibility of the labour market, there are still questions as to whether such legislation is fit for purpose. Against a backdrop of increasing employment legislation, a case Audit Office (2009) research radical also casts doubt over whether presidencys are able to understand business enough to design effective legislation. The BCC (2010), representing one nose candy thousand businesses, suggest that due to the volume and complexity of employment legislation , in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), now need schoolmaster legal advice to settle disputes. In reality, the BCC argue, it is slight(prenominal) expensive to settle disputes with the employee and prevent reputational upon than it is to defend a claim. The BCC therefore recommends streamlining and reducing the amount of legislation, for example, in a correspondent way that the anti-discrimination laws became consolidated by the equivalence Act 2010 (ibid, 2010). Despite such criticisms, not all the findings in the business celestial sphere are negative. According to a Chartered Institute of Personal Development (CIPD) refresh Report (2005), who surveyed Human Resources professionals from over sise hundred companies, the majority saw employment law as making a positive contribution to their businesses. This research suggested that the main barrier to effective implementation of employment law is the perception that there is overly much employment legislat ion (ibid). In response, the Annual Employment police check into by the Department for logical argument revolution and Skills (BIS) (2012) aims to turnout perceptions that there are too many employment laws, through lobbying for reform, while ensuring that reforms are not at the disbursal of compromising fairness for individuals. The report argues that although businesses speak up about the amount of employment legislation, in reality the UK has one of the nearly lightly-regulated labour markets among developed countries. Only the get together States and Canada have lighter overall employment regulation (OECD Indicators of Employment Protection, 2008 cit in BIS, 2012).Arguments in opt of more Employment LegislationThe UKs light touch employment regulations whitethorn be reflected in their flexible working legislation. The right to request flexible working does not enforce employers to comply with individual requests, further to offer the procedures for them to do so. It is therefore argued that it is individuals (particularly with dependents) and the social organisations who support them, who favour increasing employment legislation, in order to provide fairness at work that ensures a work life balance (Burnett et al, 2012). In a 2012 report by works Families and One Plus One, beaming Homes and prospering works, from a sample of over dickens thousand respondents, nearly eighty share of respondents felt that flexible working was the most beneficial working arrangement (Burnett et al, 2012). However, the report argued that in order to support flexible working, gain ground legislation was needed in order to promote arrangements that are reciprocally beneficial and embedded as a market-gardening of flexibility, rather than an approach that manages requests as an exception to the norm (ibid). Along with affinity and family support organisations, a growing enactment of business and HR associations support further employment legislation and refo rm to pressure forward the returnss of flexible working (CIPD, 2013). order of payment on the findings of the 2011 body of work Employment dealings Study (WERS) the CIPD suggest that employment legislation needs to increase, due in part to a lack of effective mechanisms to tackle labour relations. The report points to recent socio-economic and semipolitical changes in the UK where an increase in employment law is becoming ever more essential. For example, the facilitation of employment legislation during the 1980s and 1990s discouraged union membership and reduce collective bargaining powers. This is reflected in the WERS study, in 2012, which shows very low levels of employee engagement in collective bargaining, only six pct in private businesses, with fourteen percentage of employee trade union membership in the same sector (Wanrooy et al, 2011). The near absence seizure of collective bargaining, although removing employer constraints on freedom of action, raises concerns over employee voice, where employment legislation may be seen as an attempt to close this rift (CIPD, 2012).Danzinger and Waters Boots (2008), argue that in reality flexible working legislation does not go far enough. Unions and parent advocacy groups argue that many workers who would benefit from flexible arrangements do not postulate for them out of fear of being refused, or because of a fear that asking may imperil their careers. investigate suggests that employees will only ask for flexible work if they believe their requests will be approved. It is also argued that flexible working legislation may reinforce sexuality inequalities by linking flexible work and care responsibilities, reinforcing a mother career slash that pairs women with demotions of pay and position. Further, unsportsmanlike dismissal claims, involving refusal of flexible working, tend to favour women, who can bank on anti-discrimination legislation, such as in Adedeji v The City of capital of the United Kingdom mass (2007) (see Appendix 2), in order to substantiate their claims (ibid).Future Changes to Flexible Working LegislationNew flexible working employment legislation to come into effect in 2014 appears to overcompensate some of the above criticisms. The political science plans to extend the statutory right to request flexible working arrangements to all employees (with over twenty-six weeks service) whether they are a carer or not. This removes the present requirement that the employee must have caring responsibilities. In addition, the procedure for considering flexible working requests, which is rate of flowly very prescriptive, will be relaxed and employers will instead be required to consider requests in a reasonable manner and within a reasonable time frame (ACAS, 2014).Currently, it is practical for an employee to claim compensation due to the employers run lowure to comply with the procedures laid down in the Flexible Working (Procedural Requirements) ordinances 2002. In Bryan v Corporate Advertising Ltd ET/2105111/10, although the judgeship rejected Mrs Bryans claim that she was constructively dismissed and subjected to collateral sex discrimination, it was however held that the company had breached the procedures laid down by the 2002 Regulations. This procedural breach may no longer by relied upon under the 2014 legislation. However, successful claims may still be used under anti-discrimination legislation. In Commotion Ltd v Rutty 2006 IRLR 171 (EAT), it was upheld that the employee had been subject to constructive unfair dismissal and indirect sex discrimination, due to the employers failure to have any lawful reason to reject flexible working conditions. However, in Winfindale v Debenhams sell plc (ET/2404134/10, 20 Aug 2010), it was held that there was no indirect sex discrimination where an employer showed that they took seriously a request to return from maternity leave on a part-time groundwork to a managers role. According to a Equality and Human Rights committee report (2009), proposed changes in flexible working legislation will continue to fail to encourage workers in management positions to request flexible arrangements (EHRC, 2009). The report suggests that under current legislation, employees in management positions are less likely to make a request for flexible working, and when they do, they are less likely to succeed (ibid).In the political sympathiess Consultation on advanced(a) studys Report (2012), it is argued that current legislation that grades sure groups reinforces the idea that flexible working is only for those in caring roles, whereas the aim of the new legislation is to promote a culture where flexible working is a true ambition for all employees (HM Government, 2009). Although the legislation proposes to allow but not require employers to prioritise competing requests, employers will continue to have to show that all competing requests cannot always be accommodated, in their entirety, on business grounds (ibid). skeleton on the CIPD report (2005), a larger-than-life majority of employers find compliance with the current legislation relatively straightforward. Of those who have had problems, the main barrier to compliance is that managers find it difficult to manage employees on different flexible working arrangements. Given that the new legislation attempts to widen the right to request flexible working to all employees, employers may grammatical construction an increased challenge to accommodate competing requests. However, jibe to the same report, since the introduction of the current legislation, less than one-tenth of employers have faced iniquity or disciplinary proceedings, or an employment tribunal claim. Further, research shows that it is large multi-national companies that benefit most from flexible working arrangements. Among those benefits are improvements in staff retention, improved team spirit and a reduction in costs (CIPD, 2005). T hese reported benefits need to be balance against arguments that oppose more legislation promoting flexible working (ibid).More significantly, the statutory provision to enable greater flexibility in the workplace looks set to increase in the future. In a recent report, centering Futures The World in 2018 (2008), the findings predict that organisations will become more virtual, the premium for gift will increase, with new aspirations and ambitions of a multi-cultural, widely dispersed workforce (Chartered counselling Institute (CMI),2008).ConclusionThis report has attempted to provide an insight into the contextual background surrounding employment laws in the UK today. The focus on flexible working legislation may be seen as a striking debate, given the competing claims from employers, employees and the organisations that support them (Burnett et al, 2012). At the same time, against a backdrop of socio-political and economic changes there has been an increasing legislative re sponse to address both the rights of individual workers and a drive to improve competition, efficiency and development in the market (Pettinger, 1998). Given the predictions of further changes in the labour market, statutory provision looks set to increase in response. The debate for or against increasing legislation surrounding flexible working therefore needs to be balanced with the benefit to both businesses and the rights of individuals (CIPD, 2005). boy count 2644BibliographyAdvisory, Conciliation and Arbitration attend (ACAS) (2014) Employment legal philosophy Update. operational online from http//www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=3909 Accessed on quaternary January 2014 Anderman, S.D (2000) Labour Law management Decisions and Workers Rights fourth Edition. Oxford Oxford University Press British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) (2005) Employment Law heart and soul or BenefitBCC operational online from http//www.britishchambers.org.uk/ Accessed on fourth January 2014 British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) (2010) Employment Regulation Up to the JobMarch 2010. open online from http//www.thamesvalleychamber.co.uk Accessed on fourth January 2014 Biagi, M (2000) Job cornerstone and Labour Law From Protection Towards Pro-action. The Hague Klvwar Law International Burnett, S Coleman, L, Houlston C, Reynolds, J (2012) Happy Homes and Productive Workplaces Summary Report of Research Findings. obtainable online from http//www.oneplusone.org.uk Accessed on quaternary January 2014 Busby, N & James, G (2011) Families, Care-giving and Paid Word contend Labour Law in the twenty-first Century. Cheltenham Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd Chartered Institute of Personal Development (CIPD) (2012) Flexible Working provide and Uptake Survey Report. May 2012. Available online from http//www.cipd.co.uk/binaries/5790%20Flexible%20Working%20SR%20(WEB2).pdf Accessed on 4th January 2014 Chartered Management Institute (CMI) (2008) Management Futures The World in 2018. CMI. Available online from http//www.managers.org.uk-research-policy-published-reports Accessed on 4th January 2014 Civicus (2008) strategic Directions 2008-2012 World Alliance for Citizen Participation Available online from http//civicus.org/downloads/SDConsultation/Annex%209%20-%202008-2012%20CIVICUS%20Strategic%20Directions.pdf Danzinger, A & Waters Boots, S (2008) Memo on the Impact of the United Kingdoms Flexible Working Act. Georgetown Georgetown University Law digest Davies, A (2011) Employment Law and Workplace Law Handbook Human Resources. Cambridge Workplace Law Group Ltd Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2012) Employment Law go over Annual Update 2012. Available online from http//www.gov.uk/government/uploads/government/publication Accessed on 4th January 2014 Department of Trade and Industry (dti) (2006) Employment flexibleness and UK Regional Unemployment Persistance and Micro-economic Shocks. Employment relations Research Series No.65. Available online from http//www .berr.gov.uk/files/file36144.pdf Accessed on 4th January 2014 Equality and Human Rights focal point Report (2009) Flexible Working Policies A Comparative Review. Research Report 16. Available online from http//www.equalityandhumanrightscommission.com Faulkner, F. 2001 The engineering science question in feminist movement A view from feminist technology studies, Womens Studies International Forum, Vol. 2, No.1, pg.79-95.Hill, E.J., Hawkins, A.J., Ferris, M. & Weitzman, M. 2001. Finding an otiose Day a Week The confident(p) Influence of Perceived Job Flexibility on Work and Family Life difference Family Relations, 50(1) pg.49-58.HM Government (2012) Consultation on Modern Workplaces, Modern Workplaces Government answer on Flexible Parental Leave. November 2012. HM Government. Available online from https//www.gov.uk/government/consultations/consultation-on-modern-workplaces/ Accessed on 4th January 2014 Honeyball, S (2008) Honeyball and Bowers Textbook on Employment Law10th Edi tion. OxfordOxford University Press James, G (2006) The Work and Families Act 2006 Legislation to improve choice and flexibilityIndustrial Law Journal. Vol35,issue 3 pp 272-278 Jones, K & Jones, E (2011) Flexible Working Practices in the UKGender and Management Perspectives. Women in Society, Vol 2 Autumn 2011Available online from http//www.newport.ac.uk/research/Journals/wis/vol2/Pages/default.aspx Accessed on 4th January 2014 Keter, V (2010) Issues in Employment Law Key Issues for the New Parliament 2010. rest home of Commons Library Research, Social Reform. Available online from http//wwwParliament.uk/document/key%20issues%20in%employment. Accessed on 4th January 2014 National Audit Office (2009) Complying with Regulation Business Perceptions Survey 2009. Available online from http//www.nao.org.uk/publications/0809/complying_with_regulation.aspx Painter, R & Holmes,A (2008) Cases and Materials on Employment Law. Oxford Oxford University Press Pettinger (1998) Managing the Workfo rce. London Cassell Trade Union Congress (TUC) (2008) changing Times Newsletter No.92 13th February 2008. Trade Union Congress. Available online from http//www.tuc.org.uk/welfare-andissues//changing-times-newsletter-no.92 Wanrooy,B, Bweley, H, Bryson,A, Forth,J, Freeth,S, Stokes, L, Wood,S (2011) The 2011 Employment Relations StudyFirst Finding. London The Workplace Employment Relations Study. Available online at http//www.gov.uk/13.1010.WERS-first-findings-report-third-edition Accessed on 4th January 2014